Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-48025
Title: Rethinking rule diversity in figural matrices: A log file analysis on the role of task switching and implications from a validation study
Author(s): Weber, Dominik
Jelen, Stella
Spinath, Frank M.
Krieger, Florian
Becker, Nicolas
Koch, Marco
Language: English
Title: Intelligence
Volume: 116
Publisher/Platform: Elsevier
Year of Publication: 2026
Free key words: Figural matrices
Reasoning
Fluid intelligence
Task switching
Cognitive flexibility
Log files
Process data
Response times
Construct validity
DDC notations: 150 Psychology
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Figural matrices typically consist of multiple distinct logical rules, requiring test-takers to disengage from one rule before applying the next. Prior studies have consistently shown moderate associations between matrix performance and task-switching ability. However, these findings are largely based on correlational data. The present two-study article aimed to (a) determine, on a theoretical level, whether task-switching ability is func tionally involved in matrix processing, and (b) assess, from a diagnostic perspective, whether relaxing the constraint of distinct rules within a single matrix threatens psychometric validity. To this end, we manipulated matrices to include both distinct-rule and identical-rule transitions, enabling experimental within-subject com parisons of matrix processing in both conditions based on log file analyses. In study 1 (N = 209), task-switching ability exerted a functional influence only during distinct-rule transitions. However, the correlation between task-switching ability and matrix performance remained comparably strong even during identical-rule transi tions. This dual pattern supports both a switch-dependency hypothesis (i.e., that task-switching is functionally involved in matrix processing) and a shared-resource hypothesis (i.e., that task-switching and matrix processing draw on a common cognitive resource). In study 2 (N = 258), we evaluated the convergent validity of the newly designed mixed-rule format against the traditional distinct-rule format. Test scores were highly correlated (r = 0.87), and test characteristics (e.g., reliability, IRT and TIF parameters) and external validity were very similar. Taken together, these findings suggest that although task-switching demands can vary depending on matrix design, relaxing rule constraints does not compromise psychometric validity. This flexibility in item development may be particularly useful in large-scale assessments or student selection tests that require continuous item renewal.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1016/j.intell.2026.102020
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2026.102020
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-480255
hdl:20.500.11880/42011
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-48025
ISSN: 1873-7935
0160-2896
Date of registration: 12-Jun-2026
Faculty: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Department: HW - Psychologie
Professorship: HW - Prof. Dr. Frank Spinath
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S016028962600019X-main.pdf3,76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons