Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-48017
Title: Double-checks or better no repeated steps? The role of effective and efficient exploration behavior for successful complex problem solving
Author(s): Ruby, Julia
Weise, Julius J.
Greiff, Samuel
Sparfeldt, Jörn R.
Language: English
Title: Learning and Individual Differences
Volume: 128
Publisher/Platform: Elsevier
Year of Publication: 2026
Free key words: Complex problem solving
Intelligence
Latent class analysis
Log-file analyses
VOTAT
DDC notations: 370 Education
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Complex problem solving (CPS) is a prominent competence, significantly related to educational achievements. Regarding CPS, the domain-general exploration strategy VOTAT (vary-one-thing-at-a-time; Tschirgi, 1980) is strongly correlated with CPS success. However, the number of additional VOTAT exploration steps remained unclear. Going beyond previous studies, we combined these approaches and analyzed logfile based process data. The effectiveness (i.e., using VOTAT) and the efficiency (i.e., non-necessary, additional VOTAT-steps) of the exploration behavior were investigated across a sequence of CPS items in N = 469 high-school students. Across the item sequence, the exploration behavior became more effective and efficient. In latent class analyses, four classes were identified. Students in classes that demonstrated more effective exploration behavior reached higher intelligence and CPS performance scores than other students. Regarding the remaining classes, the relation between efficient exploration behavior with intelligence and CPS performance was less consistent. Implications for fostering students' explorations and CPS success are discussed. Educational relevance and implications statement: The results of our study emphasize the role of strategic explo ration behaviors while exploring complex problem solving (CPS) tasks for successfully solving complex problems. Based on more or less effective (i.e., using VOTAT) and efficient (i.e., the number of additional, non-necessary exploration steps) strategy use, we found four different groups (i.e., latent classes) of students: (1) ineffective explorers, (2) inefficient explorers, (3) emerging explorers, and (4) proficient explorers. Students of the four classes differed in their mean intelligence and CPS scores. These results form a basis for adaptive interventions aimed at fostering beneficial exploration strategies to improve problem solving skills as an important educational goal.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102893
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102893
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-480177
hdl:20.500.11880/42002
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-48017
ISSN: 1041-6080
Date of registration: 11-Jun-2026
Faculty: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Department: HW - Bildungswissenschaften
Professorship: HW - Prof. Dr. Jörn Sparfeldt
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1041608026000270-main.pdf3,47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons