Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-47830
Title: Variation in Manifest Subjective Refraction in a Population Screened for Refractive Surgery
Author(s): Langenbucher, Achim
Wendelstein, Jascha
Szentmáry, Nóra
Cayless, Alan
Förster, Anika
Hoffmann, Peter
Taneri, Suphi
Language: English
Title: Diagnostics
Volume: 16
Issue: 9
Publisher/Platform: MDPI
Year of Publication: 2026
Free key words: subjective manifest refraction
power vector analysis
variation in refraction
repeat measurements
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the variation in subjective manifest refraction measures in a patient cohort screened for myopic refractive surgery. Methods: In this retrospective non-randomised cross-sectional single-centre study, we evaluated a dataset containing sequences of three refraction measurements performed by four experienced optometrists in 175 eyes screened for refractive corneal or lens surgery for myopia or myopic astigmatism. Refraction was converted from sphere (SPH), cylinder (CYL) and axis to power vector components (spherical equivalent SEQ and cylinder projections C0 and C45). The mean power vectors of the three repeat measurements (MEAN) and the deviations (DEV) of the repeat measurements from the MEAN were evaluated. Results: MEAN values for SPH/CYL/SEQ/C0/C45 were −5.93/0.99/−5.44/−0.47/0.02 D and the corresponding standard deviations were 0.20/0.16/0.17/0.17/0.16 D. DEV of both SEQ and CYL correlated significantly with patient age (Spearman R = 0.16 and 0.20). DEV of CYL correlated with mean (myopic) SEQ (R = −0.22) and CYL (R = 0.27) whereas DEV of SEQ showed no significant correlation with mean SEQ or CYL. Conclusions: The variation in subjective manifest refraction with repeat measurements is in a range of ±0.16 to ±0.20 D for SPH, CYL and the power vector components SEQ, C0 and C45. If reliable subjective refraction measurements are mandatory, e.g., for planning refractive surgery procedures or for formula constant optimisation, repeat refractometry measures could help to ensure representative data and to estimate the intraindividual variations.
DOI of the first publication: 10.3390/diagnostics16091396
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091396
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-478303
hdl:20.500.11880/41834
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-47830
ISSN: 2075-4418
Date of registration: 13-May-2026
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Augenheilkunde
Professorship: M - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dipl.-Ing. Achim Langenbucher
M - Prof. Dr. med. Nóra Szentmáry
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
diagnostics-16-01396.pdf7,05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons